不要虎頭蛇尾，14天已過，有本事就來告！

民主行動黨美里支部主席房保德今天招開記者會，挑戰沈福源在14天內履行將對房保德採取法律訴訟的言論。房保德表示現有的砂州土地法典不能讓到期的地契自動更新，延生了法外立法的情況，就是一個惡法。房保德和民主行動黨將會不惜任何代價，跟美里市民站在同一陣線，來對抗惡法。

房保德說，他從頭到尾只針對一個有損人民利益的政策，從來沒有針對任何個人或任何團體。然而沈福源却對他的言論斷章取義，顯然蓄意扭曲他的原意而轉移焦點。

房保德指出，美里市的大街店屋需要花大筆費用重建，地契才能獲得更新就是一個勞民傷財的例子。業主辛苦了一輩子好不容易存了點錢，眼看地契又要到期了，還要花費13到16萬來更新地契已經很冤枉了，如今還要多花20~30幾萬的費用來重建和裝修。再說人民如果容忍這樣的惡法繼續存在，地契到期的房屋須要重建才能獲得更新，屆時拆下的建築廢料豈不充斥全州而污染環境？

“真金不怕紅火爐，讓我們在法庭上見真章，也讓擾民的現有土地法典惡法被記錄在司法的歷史記錄中，成為後人蓋棺論定的歷史資料！”

“如果沈福源認定他對我的言論的詮釋是有所根據，就應履行之前將對我採取法律訴訟的言論。如果沈福源不敢在14天內對我採取法律訴訟或做出交待，就是默認他之前的言論是在歪曲事實。”

2007-12-26

PT　Fong

Don't have to wait 14 days

不必等14天！

針對今天報章刊登“指房保德指責不實，店屋翻新工委會要追究”的言論，房保德今天做出四點聲明：

第一， 民主行動黨和房保德/我在這一件事上從頭到尾就只針對一個問題就是“修改砂州土地法典”，和一個訴求就是“地契期到期自動更新99年”。如果砂州地契沒有“到期自動更新”的話，我們很難確保一些地契在“即將到期”時會有一些法外立法，或者沒在土地法典中闡明的條件都會被例出來，一些普通的小市民常常成為受害者後都往往都有苦難言。所以店屋必需重建，即將到期的地契才能獲得自動更新，只是一個例子針對現今不合理的砂州土地法典而提出來的。這是每個人民都有權利針對任何問政策上的不公平而批評政府施政上不當的措施。

第二， 一個政黨(尤其在野黨)的任務就是監督政府的施政，在野黨最主要的任務就是“為民喉舌”，針對政府的不當施政做出批評。身為在野政黨民主行動黨的一份子，反映人民的心聲、人民的意見和人民的訴求乃在野黨的職責。
這些訴求的提出就如車輛的警示燈亮起來了，適當的做法是應該去檢查車子為何會有這樣的狀況出現，而不是去拆掉發出警示的燈泡，忽視真正的問題所在。用打壓的手段來解決問題，只是把問題掃到地毯下，當壓抑到了極點而爆發，其破壞性不容小覤。

第三， 現在店主既然已經透過我表達心聲，我就不能因為有人恫言要起訴我，我就透露他們的身份。當然如有店主願意主動站出來那就另當別論。本人絕對尊重投訴者的意願和保護他們，雖然有店主一直的在表明他的名字可以被提出來。

第四， 我不會針對這件事的言論做出任何道歉。如有關方面有意起訴的話，我的建議不必等十四天。我會坦然的去面對一切的後果，對本人所有的言論負責。

2007-12-11

PT Fong

It is the owners who oppose the reconstruction of their shops on high street in Miri. 反對大街重建是店主的意願

DAP Miri branch chairman Fong Pau Teck indicated in a press conference today, certainly it was not Mr. Fong "himself" to oppose the reconstruction of the high street commercial shop lots, instead, "the shop owners" opposed, PT Fong only spoke out the aspiration of the majority shop owners. Mr Fong also pointed out that, he had interviewed some shop owners, included a famous person, Mr Ma, in Miri, he also opposed the reconstruction. The shop owner, Mr Ma said his shop will not collapse even though passes through another 100 years, therefore, reconstruction is not necessary. According to Mr Ma, only minor repair will do, such as to change the roofs as well as to made a firewall, to change the lignin floors so as the water pipes and the electrical wires.

This unnecessary reconstruction will at least make the shop owners lost more than 300 thousands (more than a year's rental loss and nearly 200 thousands reconstruction fees). This is simply to waste the people’s hard earn money.

On 16 Nov 2006, Dato' Sim沈福源 expressed in the press: "the owners of the old shop area, because of the structure of the shops has already worn out, the appearance is not pleasing to the eyes, and this is entirely uncoordinated with the development of the whole city, therefore, they( the shop owners) actively proposed to have the renovation project, and apply to prolong the land titles from the government.

But after a few days, on 22 Nov 2006, CM expressed, he was informed that a group of merchants from Miri High Street wanted to renew their land titles urgently. He told Dr Chan副首長陳康南 that unless these commercial shops have been reconstructed, otherwise, he will not authorize them to renew the land titles. He said, “These shops are very old, they constructed at the year of 1950s. Miri has become a modern city now, if allow them to renew the land titles automatically, this will cause recession in the future, the value of the related shops and area will depreciate."

A year later, on 30 Nov 2007, Mr Sim expressed in the newspaper, shops which had been constructed during British colony, due to the building materials cannot be achieved the safety standard, there might be a possibility to collapse in the future, therefore, decided to have them reconstruct. (30 Nov 2007 United Daily)

The people feel confused about this, CM's words clearly indicated the reason for the reconstruction of the shops and he had never mentioned that the shops in this area might face the collapse problem in the future. If there is really such a matter, did the state government appoint any experts to investigate the old shops in Miri? Are there any assessment documents to prove that the shops in the concerned area will face the crisis to collapse? The buildings during British colony, the standard was definitely according to the local construction standard in England, if the shops in such area will face this problem after few decades, does this mean that the buildings in England or those were built in the Common Wealth countries during British colony will also face the problem? If the answer is firm, all the buildings which are over 60 years should also be reconstructed then, will not the demolished waste materials make our earth burden deeply?

If the decision of the reconstruction for Miri old shops, which is without any experts' assessment documents support, means any title of the buildings which almost expiry and intend to renew the land titles, will probably face the misfortune and be ordered to reconstruct. How could the people bear with the heavy cost of renewal plus the reconstruction fees?

Only amend the land code, allowing automatic renewal for the land titles 99 years on the expiry date, can only safeguard the people's rights and interests. The properties of the people will only then cannot be confiscated casually by the government. Besides the above problems in which relate to the Sarawak Land Code, also evolving the problem of corruption as well as the abusing of power.

民主行動黨美里支部主席房保德今天對媒體表示，並不是房保德 “本人” 反對大街的店屋重建，而是 “店主” 反對，房保德只是說出大部份店主的心聲而已。房保德指出，他訪問了一些的店主，包括美里一位有名的馬姓的店主，他們都反對重建。馬姓店主說他的店再經過一百年都不會倒塌，重建是沒有必要的。根據馬姓的店主表示，只要做局部的翻修既可，如翻新屋頂和加建防火牆，木的樓板翻新，水管和電線換新既可。

這沒必要的重建至少讓店主損失超過三十萬令吉(一年多的租金損失和接近二十萬令吉的重建費用)。而且重建後新店的價值(格) 並沒有提高，簡直是勞民傷財。

16/11/06拿督沈福源曾對媒體說： "舊店屋地區的店主，基於店屋結構已殘舊不已，外貌也不美觀，這和美里整個城市的發展不協調，所以，他們（店主）都主動提出翻新工程，並向政府申請延長地契" 。

但 在幾天之後的22/11/06 ，首長丕顯斯里阿都泰益瑪目表示，他被告知，美里大街的一群商家非常迫切想要盡快更新他們的地契，他告訴副首長拿督巴丁宜陳康南，除非這些商店重新修建， 否則他將不會批准他們更新地契。他說： "這些店屋已非常殘舊，它們是在1950年年代建造的。如今美里已經成為一個摩登的城市，如果允許他們自動更新地契，這在未來將會造成肅條，有關商店和地區的價值將貶值" 。

事隔一年後的30/11/07 ，沈福源卻在報章表示，英殖民地時期建設的商店，由於建材問題不合安全標準，日後有可能會面對倒塌，因此決定拆除重建。 （ 30 / 11月7日"聯和日報" ）

民 眾為此感到混淆，首長的談話已清楚表明其指示該區店屋須重新修建的原因根本沒提到該區店屋日後可能面對倒塌的問題。如果真有那麼一回事，州政府有沒有委派任何專家對美里市區舊店屋進行鑑定？有何鑑定文件證明該區店屋日後將面對倒塌的危機？英殖民地時期的建築物，其標準肯定也是根據英國國內的建築標準，如果該區店屋在經過數十年會面臨倒塌危機，那英國國內或曾是英國殖民地的共和聯邦國家的舊建築物是不是都會面臨這樣的危機？如果答案是肯定的話，那經過六十年的建築物都必須拆掉重建，拆除的建築廢料豈不令地球不勝負荷？

如果今天美里舊店屋須拆除重建的決定是沒有任何專家鑑定文件扶持，即意味著日後任何地契即將到期的建築物如欲更新地契年限，將有可能面對被勒令重建的厄運。更新費加上重建的建築費，教人民情何以堪？

唯有在土地契法典內修訂保障人民權益的條文，即地契到期自動更新99年，才能令人民的土地擁有權獲得保障，人民的產業才不會隨隨便便就被政府沒收。現有的土地法典除了上述問題以外，也衍生貪污濫權的問題。

"自動更新，難道要更新給死人" 這句話不應該出自人聯主席的口裡。

唯有“地契到期自動更新”的條文以白紙黑字列入土地法典裡，地主和產業業主的權益才能受到保障。以目前的情況看來，就是生殺大權完全操縱在部長手裡，部長說更新地契必須 ‘重建’ 就要 ‘重建’，部長說 ‘更新稅’ 多少就是多少！

房保德指出大街商業店因地契既將到期須要重建就是一個例子；如地契到期可以自動更新的話，這些店主的權力就不會旁落任人宰割，而必須要花費大把的金錢來‘重建’店屋地契才能獲得‘更新’。另外還要還高昂的更新稅，中間間店屋為13萬1千令吉，旁邊間店屋16萬令吉的更新稅！

大街店屋的重建在很多方面來看都是不正確的，有關當局的說法是為了‘美化’城市。另一方面，我們看到很多國家的歷史古蹟建築物有幾百年至上千年的歷史都有，而且這些歷史古蹟建築物也吸引了不少的觀光客，難道那些古蹟把整個城市都‘醜化’了？把美里最早的店屋拆了，美里的歷史的事跡也就因此少了這一塊。

還有那些因店屋的重建而敲下的廢棄物，不論丟在那裡都造成環境的污染。

另外，馬寶園的4點地的排屋更新稅只要2000令吉，是否是依地價的25%的規定計算？政府也沒向人民解釋那更新稅到底是如何算出來的？這讓人民不竟要問這更新稅的“標準到底在哪裡”？ 還是因為就近大選要到了就拿幾顆糖果來騙騙一下選民，等大選一過更新稅的標準又不一樣了？就是要部長你說 ‘更新稅’ 多少人民就得付多少? 人民的產業在不受到法律的保障之下任人宰割，讓部長可以法外立法，操縱生殺大權。

民眾的懷疑到底那2000令吉的更新稅是否依照目前的土地政策規定，按地價的25%來抽？如是的話，那就表示目前馬寶園的地價每點地才2千令吉，一間4點地的排屋才值8千令吉？那就是否意謂着如政府把馬寶園劃上紅線，也只須賠償8千令吉給每間4點地的排屋屋主？由此可見，只要土地法典中沒有闡明“地契到期自動更新”，地主和屋主的權益永遠不會受到保障。

中國是個共產國家，並非實施民主制度，但中國政府都還要傾聽人民的心聲，在今年3月通過了“物權法” 並在10月1日開始實行，來保障產業業主、地主和屋主的權益，讓那些到期的地契自動延長自動更新。反觀我們這民主的國家人民的 ‘心聲’ 却不受到政府的重視，反而還說出“自動更新，難道要更新給死人”這種話，由此看來現在的砂州政府眼中根本就沒有砂州人民。在一個法制的國家裡，“物產的所有權”是一個很重要的概念，既使是 “死人” 的 “所有權” 也是不能被剝奪、也要受到保障，因此人死之後的 “產業所有權” 可以轉移給他至親的人。“自動更新，難道要更新給死人”這句話不應該出自一個民選政府領袖的口裡。

這是美里旅遊城？水溝變池塘？Is this Miri – the travelling city? The Drain became the pond?

這就是美里“ City ”！
這就是國陣政府所說的發展？BN Boleh!
This is exactly what we call Miri "City"!
Is this what BN government call the development? BN Boleh!

這就是人聯領袖為民服務的精神？Is this the party supp spirit in “serving for the people"?

“Do not impose what you don’t want to others”, this statement definitely cannot be found from the dictionary of some of the SUPP local leaders. On the other hand, we only can see the situation “what we don’t want…. impose to others” from them.

After receiving a complaint from Sg. Rait locals, DAP Miri branch chairman cum assistant-secretary of DAP Sarawak state committee Fong Pau Teck went to the location to look at the problem personally and discovered the following situation.

The drainage along both sides of the road should maintain unobstructedly, but the drainage of the one side of the road, “very coincidentally” when it reaches the area of the houses of some SUPP local leaders, it found that being "obstructed". Moreover, they can even mobilize the local authority, of course to use our tax payers' money, to dig an under-ground drainage that led the water to the other side of the road. One household, on the downstream, who has actually suffered a lot whenever heavy rain as the water can hardly be drained away. The concerned person expressed if letting the water from the opposite road to lead over again, the consequence really cannot be imagined, if heavy rain happens again, the road might be also collapsed. Again, needed to use our tax payers' money to repair the road. Just because the areas of Supp local leaders will not get flooded under heavy rain, and don’t care about others alive or not.

PT Fong unavoidably wants to question Supp. Is this the party spirit in “serving people"?

Mr Fong even wonders very much about the management ability of the local council. We can see from many signs where the local council is not elected by the people has caused all sort of abuse of power. Mr Fong has called upon the concerned authority to look at this case seriously to avoid making it an election issue.

「己所不欲勿施於人」這句話決對不在人聯黨一些地方領袖的字典裡，相反的另人看到的是「己所不欲強施於人」的情況！

民主行動黨美里支部主席兼砂州委員會副秘書房保德接到Sg. Rait居民投訴後到當地了解情況後發現以下的情況。

大路兩邊的水溝應該要保持通暢，但其中一邊的水溝非常“巧合”的到某些人聯黨地方黨領袖住家范圍時就“不通”了。更厲害的是，他們竟然有權力動用當地的地方政府相關單位(也就是用老百姓的納稅錢)，來開一條暗溝把水通到馬路對面(另一邊)的水溝。水溝的下游的一戶家人本來就己經受到下大雨時排水不及的苦了，事主表示如再把馬路對面的水也放過來的話，後果真不敢想像，到時下大雨可能馬路也會崩塌掉，又要花人民大把的納稅錢修路，完全只為一些人聯黨的地方領袖“怕”他們的地在下大雨時會掩水，別人死活沒關係！

房保德不免要問，難道這就是人聯黨"為民服務"的精神？

房保德更質疑當地地方議會的辦事能力，種種的跡象讓人看到地方議會不民選導致各種濫權弊端叢生的現象。房保德呼籲有關當局重視這事件，(他也好心先通知人聯)免得到時這個成為大選的課題！

國陣議員只會講不會做

國陣議員今年3月30日的承諾，半年過去了，卑爾騷3號路口任然是封閉的！